بررسی مدل‌های نفوذ پرتابه در اهداف فلزی و سرامیکی

نوع مقاله: مقالات مروری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)

2 دانشیار، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)

3 استاد، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)

10.22044/jsfm.2020.8459.2914

چکیده

نفوذ پرتابه در اهداف ترکیبی یکی از موضوع های مهم و اساسی در علم مکانیک است. نفوذ پرتابه در این مقاله در سه بخش بررسی شده است. بخش اول مربوط به مدل‌‌های نفوذ در فلزها، بخش دوم مربوط به مدل‌های نفوذ با اعداد بی‌بعد و بخش سوم مربوط به نفوذ در سرامیک‌ها است. در بخش اول علاوه بر مرور مدل‌های تحلیلی نفوذ، دسته‌بندی و خلاصه آنها نیز بیان‌شده است. مدل‌ها شامل معادله پانسلت، تئوری هیدرودینامیک، تئوری هیدرودینامیک اصلاح‌شده، رچت-ایپسون، تیت-الکسویسکی، انبساط حفره، راوید- بادنر، والکر-اندرسون، و مدل‌های شبیه‌سازی هست. فرضیه های مدل‌ها کاملاً مشخص شده و داده‌هایی از پیش‌بینی مدل‌ها در مقایسه با داده‌های تجربی بدست آمده است. این فرضیه ها شامل نفوذ جسم صلب، نفوذ سایشی، نفوذ پایدار و انتقالی و نفوذ کامل است. در بخش دوم مدل‌های بی‌بعد برای نفوذ پرتابه و در بخش سوم، مدل‌های تحلیلی نفوذ در اهداف ترکیبی سرامیک – فلز موردبررسی قرارگرفته است. در این مقاله، مدل‌های بنیادی مربوط به نفوذ پرتابه در اهداف فلزی و سرامیکی دسته بندی شده است. ضمناً، تحلیل کامل و دقیقی برای این مدل ها نیز بیان شده است

کلیدواژه‌ها


[1] Backman ME, Goldsmith W (1978) The mechanics of penetration of projectiles into targets. Int J Eng Sci 16(1): 1-100.

[2] Jonas GH, Zukas JA (1978) Mechanics of penetration:  analysis and experiment. Int J Engng Sci 16(11): 879-904.

[3] Anderson CE, Bodner SR (1988) Ballistic impact:  the status of analytical and numerical modeling. Int J Impact Engng 7(1): 9-35.

[4] Goldsmith W (1999) Non-ideal projectile impact on targets. Int J Impact Engng 22(2-3): 95-395.

[5] Ruh R, Stiglich JJ, Rankin DT (1971) Current and potential opaque ceramic armor materials.  SAMPE Q 2: 46–50.

[6] Wilkins ML (1978) Mechanics of penetration and perforation. Int J Eng Sci 16: 793-807.

[7] Anderson CE (2002) Developing an ultra-lightweight armor concept. Ceram transactions 134: 485-498.

 [8] Skaggs SR (2003) A brief history of ceramic armor development. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 24 (3): 337-349.

[9] Wilkins ML, Honodel CA and Sawle D (1967) Approach to the study of light armor. Report no. UCRL-50284, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore,  CA, USA.

[10] Wilkins ML (1977) Use of boron compounds in lightweight armor. Boron and refractory borides 633-648.

[11] Landingham RL, Casey AW (1972) Final report of the light armor program.  Report no. UCRL-51269, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.

[12] Damghani Nouri M, Hatami H (2014) Experimental and numerical study of the effect of longitudinal reinforcements on cylindrical and conical absorbers under impact loading. Indian J Sci Tech 7 (2): 199-210.

[13] Hatami H, Shokri Rad M, Ghodsbin Jahromi A (2017) theoretical analysis of the energy absorption response of expanded metal tubes under impact loads. Int J Impact Eng 109: 224-239.

[14] Jahromi Ghodsbin A, Hatami H (2018) Numerical Behavior Study of Expanded Metal Tube Absorbers and Effect of Cross Section Size and Multi-Layer under Low Axial Velocity Impact Loading. Amirkabir Journal of Mechanical Engineering 49 (4): 685-696. (In Persian)

[15] Najafi M, Hosseini SH, Joudaki J (2018) Penetration of armored piercing projectile into ultra-high strength steel targets: Numerical and experimental investigation. Journal of Solid and Fluid Mechanics 8(2): 81-92. (In Persian)

[16] Hatami H, Fathollahi AB (2018) theoretical and numerical study and comparison of the inertia effects on the collapse behavior of expanded metal tube absorber with single and double cell under impact loading. Amirkabir Journal of Mechanical Engineering 50 (5): 999-1014. (In Persian)

[17] Hatami H, Hosseini M, Yasuri AK (2019) Perforation of thin aluminum targets under hypervelocity impact of aluminum spherical projectiles. Mater Eval 77(3): 411-422.

[18] Forrestal MJ, Piekutowski AJ (2000) Penetration experiments with 6061-T6511 aluminum targets and spherical-nose steel projectiles at striking velocities between 0.5 and 3 km/s. Int J Impact Eng 24: 57-67.

 [19] Stilp AJ, Hohler V (1990) Long rod penetration mechanics. Chapter 5 in High Velocity Impact Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

[20] Wickert M (2007) Penetration data for a medium caliber tungsten sinter alloy penetrator into aluminum alloy 7020 in the velocity regime from 250 m/s to 1900 m/s. Proc 23rd Int Symp Ballistics 2:1437-1452.

[21] Birkhoff G, MacDougall DP, Pugh EM and Taylor G (1948) Explosives with lined cavities. J Appl Phys 19: 563-582.

[22] Eichelberger RJ (1956) Experimental test of the theory of penetration by metallic jets. J Appl Phys 27(1): 63-68.

[23] Allen WA, Rogers JW (1961) Penetration of a rod into a semi-infinite target. J Franklin Inst 272: 275-284.

[24] Christman DR, Gehring JW (1966) Analysis of high-velocity projectile penetration mechanics. J Appl Phys 37(4): 1579-1587.

[25] Recht R, Ipson T (1963) Ballistic perforation dynamics. J Appl Mech 30 (3): 384-390.

[26] Tate A (1967) A theory for the deceleration of long rods after impact. J Mech Phys Solids 15: 387-399.

[27] Alekseevskii VP (1966) Penetration of a rod into a target at high velocity. Fizika Goreniya I Vzryva 2(2): 99-106.

[28] Tate A (1969) Further results in the theory of long rod penetration. J Mech Phys Solids 17: 141-150.

[29] Tate A (1986) Long rod penetration Models-Part I.  A flow field model for high speed long rod penetration. Int J Mech Sci 28(8): 535-548.

[30] Tate A (1986) Long rod penetration models-Part II. Extensions to the hydrodynamic theory of penetration. Int J Mech Sci 28(9): 599-612.

[31] Bishop RF, Hill R, Mott NF (1945) The theory of indentation and hardness. Proc Royal Soc 57(3): 147-159.

[32] Anderson CE, Behner T, Hohler V (2013) Penetration efficiency as a function of target obliquity and projectile pitch. J Appl Mech 80: 031801-1/11.

[33] Charles JrE, Behner T, Hohler V (2013) Penetration efficiency as a function of target obliquity and projectile pitch. J Appl Mech80 (3): 031801.

[34] Rubin MB, Kositski R, Rosenberg Z (2016) Essential physics of target inertia in penetration problems missed by cavity expansion models. Int J Impact Engng 98: 97-104.

[35] Rosenberg Z, Dekel E (2016) A comment on ‘The effect of target inertia on the penetration of aluminum targets by rigid ogive-nosed long rods’ by T. L. Warren. Letter to the Editor Int J Impact Engng 93: 231-233.

[36] Warren TL (2016) Response to: ‘A comment on ‘The effect of target inertia on the penetration of aluminum targets by rigid ogive-nosed long rods by T. L. Warren’ by Z. Rosenberg and E. Dekel. Letter to the Editor Int J Impact Engng 93: 234-235.

[37] Warren TL (2016) the effect of target inertia on the penetration of aluminum targets by rigid ogive-nosed long rods. Int J Impact Eng91: 6-13.

[38] Babaei H, Mostofi TM, Alitavoli M (2016) Experimental and analytical investigation into large ductile transverse deformation of monolithic and multi-layered metallic square targets struck normally by rigid spherical projectile. Thin Wall Struct 1 (107): 257-65.

[39] Babaei H, Mirzababaie Mostofi T, Armoudli E (2017) On dimensionless numbers for the dynamic plastic response of quadrangular mild steel plates subjected to localized and uniform impulsive loading. P I Mech Eng E-J Pro Mech Eng 231 (5): 939-50.

[40] Babaei H, Mostofi TM, Alitavoli M (2015) Study on the response of circular thin plate under low velocity impact. Int J Geo Mech 9 (2): 207-18.

[41] Babaei H, Mirzababaie Mostofi T (2016) new dimensionless numbers for deformation of circular mild steel plates with large strains as a result of localized and uniform impulsive loading. P I Mech Eng L-J Pro Mat Des Appl 1464420716654195.

[42] Babaei H, Mirzababaie Mostofi T, Armoudli E (2017) on dimensionless numbers for the dynamic plastic response of quadrangular mild steel plates subjected to localized and uniform impulsive loading. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. P I Mech Eng E-J Pro Mech Eng 231 (5): 939-50.

[43] Li Q, Jones N (2000) On dimensionless numbers for dynamic plastic response of structural members. Arch Appl Mech 70 (4): 245-254.

[44] Jacob N, Yuen SCK, Nurick G, Bonorchis D, Desai S, Tait D (2004) Scaling aspects of quadrangular plates subjected to localised blast loads—experiments and predictions. Int J Impact Eng 30(8-9): 1179-1208.

[45] Park BW, Cho SR (2006) Simple design formulae for predicting the residual damage of unstiffened and stiffened plates under explosion loadings. Int J Impact Eng 32 (10): 1721-1736.

[46] Yao S, Zhang D, Lu F (2015) Dimensionless numbers for dynamic response analysis of clamped square plates subjected to blast loading. Arch Appl Mech 85(6): 735-744.

[47] Mostofi TM, Babaei H, Alitavoli M, Hosseinzadeh S (2017) On dimensionless numbers for predicting large ductile transverse deformation of monolithic and multi-layered metallic square targets struck normally by rigid spherical projectile. Thin Walled Struct 112: 118-124.

[48] Reijer PC (1991) Impact on ceramic faced armour PhD thesis, Technical University Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.

[49] Woodward RL (1990) a simple one-dimensional approach to modelling   ceramic   composite   armour   defeat.  Int J Impact Eng 9: 455-474.

[50] Walley SM (2010) Historical review of high strain rate and shock properties of ceramics relevant to their application in armour. Adv Appl Cer 109 (8): 446-466.

[51] Florence AL, Ahrens T (1967)Interaction of projectiles and composite armor. Stanford Research Inst Menlo Park CA.

[52] Rozenberg Z, Yeshurun Y (1988) the relation between ballistic efficiency and compressive strength of ceramic tiles. Int J Impact Eng 7(3): 357-362.

[53] Zaera R, Sánchez-Gálvez V (1998) Analytical modelling of normal and oblique ballistic impact on ceramic/metal lightweight armours. Int J Impact Eng 21(3): 133-148.

[54] Benloulo IC, Sanchez-Galvez V (1998) A new analytical model to simulate impact onto ceramic/composite armors. Int J Impact Eng 21(6): 461-471.

[55] Fellows N, Barton P (1999) Development of impact model for ceramic-faced semi-infinite armour. Int J Impact Eng 22(8): 793-811.

[56] Zaera R, Sánchez-Sáez S, Pérez-Castellanos JL, Navarro C (2000) Modelling of the adhesive layer in mixed ceramic/metal armours subjected to impact. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 31(8): 823-833.

[57] Hohler V, Weber K, Tham R, James B, Barker A, Pickup I (2001) Comparative analysis of oblique impact on ceramic composite systems. Int J Impact Eng 26(1-10): 333-344.

[58] Fawaz Z, Zheng W, Behdinan K (2004) Numerical simulation of normal and oblique ballistic impact on ceramic composite armours. Compos Struct 63(3-4): 387-395.

[59] Rosenberg Z, Ashuach Y, Dekel E (2007) more on the ricochet of eroding long rods—validating the analytical model with 3D simulations. Int J Impact Eng 34(5): 942-957.

[60] Shokrieh M, Javadpour G (2008) Penetration analysis of a projectile in ceramic composite armor. Compos Struct 82(2): 269-276.

[61] Ziashamami M, Khodarahmi h, Vahedi K, Pol MH (2013) Experimental and numerical investigation of a blunt rigid projectile penetrating into a sandwich panel having aluminum foam core. Modares Mech Eng 13(5): 1-13. {In Persian}

[62] Hedayatian m, Lighat G, Rahimi CH, Pol MH (2014) Numerical and experimental analyses of projectile penetration in grid cylindrical composite structures under high velocity Impact. Search Results Web results. Modares Mechanical Engineering 14(9): 17-26. (In Persian)

[63] Yazdani M, Rashed A (2015) Studying the performance of multi-layered ceramic-epoxy armor under high velocity ballistic impact with finite element method. Modares Mechanical Engineering 15(1): 11-20. (In Persian)

[64] Tahmaseiabdar M, Liaghat GH, Shanazari H, Khodadadi A, Hadavinia H, Abotorabi A (2015) Analytical and numerical investigation of projectile perforation into ceramic-metal targets and presenting a modified theory. Modares Mechanical Engineering 15(9): 353-359. (In Persian)

[65] Mehrabani Yeganeh E, Liaghat GH, Pol MH (2015) Experimental investigation of cylindrical projectiles nose shape effects on high velocity perforation of woven polymer composite. Modares Mechanical Engineering 14(14): 309-318. (In Persian)

[66] Shanazari H, Lighat GH, Feli S (2016) Analysis   of penetration process in hybrid ceramic - nanocomposite targets. Modares Mechanical Engineering 16(10): 137-146. (In Persian)

[67] Bidi A, Liaghat GH, Rahimi CH (2016) Experimental and numerical analysis of impact on steel curved panels. Modares Mechanical Engineering 16(4): 281-288. (In Persian)

[68] Ni C, Hou R, Han B, Jin F, Ma G, Lu T (2017) Normal and oblique projectile impact of double-layered pyramidal lattice trus structures filed with ceramic insertions. Thermoplast Compos Mater 30(8): 1136-1156.

[69] Kılıç N, Ekici B, Bedir S (2017) Optimization of high hardness perforated steel armor plates using finite element and response surface methods. Mech Adv Mater Struc 24(7): 615-624.

[70] Fras T, Faderl N (2018) Influence of add-on perforated plates on the protective performance of Light-Weight Armour Systems. Problemy Mechatroniki: uzbrojenie, lotnictwo, inżynieria bezpieczeństwa 9.

[71] Sayah badkhor M, vahedi k, Naddaf Oskouei AR (2019) Presenting a modified theory and analytical investigation of projectile penetration into ceramic - metal semi-infinite targets. Journal of Solid and Fluid Mechanics 9(2): 31-45. (In Persian)