Solving the inverse problem of identification of FE model parameters of a non-uniform beam using genetic algorithms

Authors

1 MSc, Mech. Eng., Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student, Mech. Eng., Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 Assoc. Prof., Mech. Eng.,Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In an inverse problem, it is desired to construct the model of a system, using the observable characteristics of the system under consideration, so that it can predict the behavior of the system as accurately as possible. In this study, a non-uniform beam is assumed as the structure whose FE model is desired to be updated. The first three natural frequencies and mode shapes of the non-uniform beam are derived analytically and are assumed as the pseudo experimentally-obtained dynamic characteristics of the structure. Then, the mentioned dynamic characteristics are used to solve the inverse problem of identification of finite element model parameters of the non-uniform beam using genetic algorithms. Investigating the effect of the number of cross-sections of the finite element model of a non-uniform beam on the accuracy of the results, it is observed that the more cross-sections the finite element model has, the more capable it is in predicting the dynamic behavior of a non-uniform beam.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
[1] Dunn SA (1997) Modified genetic algorithm for the identification of aircraft structures. J Aircraft 34(2): 251-253.
[2] Dunn SA (1998) Optimisation of the structural dynamic finite element model for a complete aircraft. 21st Congress of the Int Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. Melbourne, Australia.
[3] Dunn SA (1999) Technique for unique optimization of dynamic finite element models. J Aircraft 36(6): 919-925.
[4] Trivailo PM, et al. (2006) Inverse problem of aircraft structural parameter estimation: application of neural networks. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 14(4): 351-363.
[5] Trivailo PM, et al. (2006) Inverse problem of aircraft structural parameter identification: application of genetic algorithms compared with artificial neural networks. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 14(4): 337-350.
[6] Wu JJ (1975) On the stability of a free-free beam under axial thrust subjected to directional control. J Sound Vib 43(1): 45-52.
[7] Joshi A, Suryanarayan S (1989) Unified analytical solution for various boundary conditions for the coupled flexural-torsional vibration of beams subjected to axial loads and end moments. J Sound Vib 129(2): 313-326.
[8] Joshi A (1995) Free vibration characteristics of variable mass rockets having large axial thrust/acceleration. J Sound Vib 187(4): 727-736.
[9] Kirillov ON, Seyranian AP (1998)   Optimization of stability of a flexible missile under follower thrust. Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A., 2063–2073.
[10] Wu L, Xie C, and Yang C (2012) Aeroelastic Stability of a Slender Missile with Constant Thrust. Procedia Eng 31: 128-135.
[11] Srinivas M, Patnaik LM (1994) Genetic algorithms: A survey. Computer 27(6): 17-26.
[12] Herrera F, Lozano M, Verdegay JL (1998) Tackling real-coded genetic algorithms: Operators and tools for behavioural analysis. Artificial intelligence review 12(4): 265-319.
[13] Malhotra R, Singh N, Singh Y (2011) Genetic algorithms: Concepts, design for optimization of process controllers. Comput Inf Sci 4(2): 39-54.
[14] Taha MH, Abohadima S (2008) Mathematical model for vibrations of non-uniform flexural beams. Engineering Mechanics 15(1): 3-11.
[15] Rigner L (1998) Modal assurance criteria value for two orthogonal modal vectors. 16th Int Modal Analysis Conference, Santa Barbara, California, 1320-1325.
[16] Allemang RJ (2003) The modal assurance criterion–twenty years of use and abuse. Sound and Vib 37(8): 14-23.
[17] Pastor M, Binda M, HarĨarik T (2012) Modal assurance criterion. Procedia Eng 48: 543-548.