Experimental determination of the parameters of ductile damage model of aluminum 5083 and numerical application of the calibrated model

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering / Kermanshah University of Technology

2 department of mechanical engineering/ lermanshah university of technology

3 department of mechanical engineering/ kermanshah university of technology

Abstract

In this research, the mechanical behavior and the phenomenon of ductile damage of Al5083 are studied and the relationship between the fracture strain and the state of stress at the damage location is presented based on the classic damage models of Johnson-Cook, Rice-Tracy and Hooputra. Based on the results, in the studied stress triaxilality range, the difference between the models is insignificant and each of them can be used with reasonable accuracy. Calibrating of the models has been done using experimental results on the both smooth and notched flat specimens. In order to check the results of the obtained model, the process has been simulated in the Abaqus and its results have been compared with the experimental results. The results of the numerical and experimental simulations were in good agreement and based on them, the extracted model was able to predict the maximum force with the accuracy of more than ±2.5%.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Shrot, A. and M. Bäker, Determination of Johnson–Cook parameters from machining simulations. Computational Materials Science, 2012. 52(1): p. 298-304.
  2. Gambirasio, L. and E. Rizzi, On the calibration strategies of the Johnson–Cook strength model: Discussion and applications to experimental data. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2014. 610: p. 370-413.
  3. Gambirasio, L. and E. Rizzi, An enhanced Johnson–Cook strength model for splitting strain rate and temperature effects on lower yield stress and plastic flow. Computational Materials Science, 2016. 113: p. 231-265.
  4. Rice, J.R. and D.M. Tracey, On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields∗. J. the Mech. Phys. Solid., 1969. 17(3): p. 201-217.
  5. Bai, Y., X. Teng, and T. Wierzbicki, On the Application of Stress Triaxiality Formula for Plane Strain Fracture Testing. J. Eng. Mater. Tech., 2009. 131(2).
  6. Bai, Y. and T. Wierzbicki, A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and Lode dependence. International J. Plastic., 2008. 24(6): p. 1071-1096.
  7. Bao, Y. and T. Wierzbicki, On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2004. 46(1): p. 81-98.
  8. Hooputra, H., et al., A comprehensive failure model for crashworthiness simulation of aluminium extrusions. Int. J. of Crashworthiness, 2004. 9(5): p. 449-464.
  9. Bobbili, R. and M. Vemuri, A Modified Johnson-Cook Model for FeCoNiCr high entropy alloy over a wide range of strain rates. Materials Letters, 2018. 218.
  10. Milani, A.S., et al., An improved multi-objective identification of Johnson–Cook material parameters. Int. J. Impact Eng., 2009. 36(2): p. 294-302.
  11. Majzoobi, G.H. and F.R. Dehgolan, Determination of the constants of damage models. Procedia Engineering, 2011. 10: p. 764-773.
  12. Banerjee, A., et al., An Experimental Determination of Johnson Cook Material and Failure Model Constants for Armour Steel. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014. 592-594: p. 990-995.

 

  1. Banerjee, A., et al., Determination of Johnson cook material and failure model constants and numerical modelling of Charpy impact test of armour steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2015. 640: p. 200-209.
  2. Buzyurkin, A.E., I.L. Gladky, and E.I. Kraus, Determination and verification of Johnson–Cook model parameters at high-speed deformation of titanium alloys. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015. 45: p. 121-127.
  3. Zhang, X., R. Shivpuri, and A.K. Srivastava. Microstructure Sensitive Flow Stress Based on Self Consistent Method. in ASME 2016 11th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. 2016.
  4. Liu, J., Y. Bai, and C. Xu, Evaluation of Ductile Fracture Models in Finite Element Simulation of Metal Cutting Processes. J. Manufac. Sci. Eng., 2013. 136(1).
  5. Mashayekhi, M. and S. Ziaei-Rad, Identification and validation of a ductile damage model for A533 steel. J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 2006. 177(1): p. 291-295.
  6. Ribeiro, J., A. Santiago, and C. Rigueiro, Damage model calibration and application for S355 steel. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2016. 2: p. 656-663.
  7. Wierzbicki, T., et al., Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2005. 47(4): p. 719-743.
  8. Hancock, J.W. and A.C. Mackenzie, On the mechanisms of ductile failure in high-strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states. J. the Mech. Phys. Solids, 1976. 24(2): p. 147-160.
  9. Lee, Y.-W., Fracture prediction in metal sheets. 2006.
Journal of Solid and Fluid Mechanics
Volume 14, Issue 2
May and June 2024
Pages 127-138

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics