The effect of impact loadingon crack propagation in forgedsteel EA4T

Authors

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the experimental and analytical investigation carried out using a steel forged material, EA4T, subjected to impact loading conditions within the strain rate domain101-103(1/s). The standard three point bend test specimens manufactured according to ASTM 399 standard were subjected to impact loadlevels correspondingto preset defined impact energy levels by applying the Izod impact testing equipment. The specimens were also modeled and the loading condition was simulated using the finite element commercial software, ABAQUS v6.11.Both the experimental findings and the finite element analysis results indicated that the crack initiation conditions were satisfied when the impact energy applied to the specimen reached a specifiedlevel.It was found that for a lower level of applied impact energy, the impact loading resulted in improving the fatigue characteristic of the material.In contrast, application of the higher impact energy caused the crack to propagate further. The other finding of the study was that increasing the plastic zone size decreased the crack propagation rate (da/dE).

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Jonson W (1972) Impact strength of materials. Edward Arnold Co.
[2] Meng Z, Pinsheng Y, Yuxu T, Yan L, Shupeng G (1999) An observation of crack initiation and early crack growth under impact fatigue loading. Materials Science and Engineering: Vol 271: 390–394.
[3] Iguchi H, Tanakat K, Tairaw S (1999) Failure mechanisms in impact fracture of metals. Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University, Nagaoka, Japan, Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
[4] Johnson P, Zhang XP, Pluvinage (1999) Crack growth rate in impact fatigue and in programmed variable amplitude loading fatigue. Engineering Fracture Mechanics Vol 37(3): 519–525.
[5] Cohen A, Yalvac S (1992) Developent and application of an impact fracture test. MI 48674-1714 USA.
[6] Tanaka T, Kinoshita K, Nakayama H (1989) Fatigue crack growth and microscopic crack opening behaviour under impact fatigue load. International Journal of Fatigue Vol 11(2): 117–123.
[7] Nakayama H, Tozawa K, Hirano A (1987) Fatigue crack growth retardation due to the application of impact overloads. International Journal of Fatigue Vol 9(3): 163–168.
[8] Zhang M, Yang P, Tan Y (1999) Micro mechanisms of fatigue crack nucleation and short crack growth in low carbon steel under low cycle impact fatigue loading. International Journal of Fatigue Vol 21(8): 823–830
 [9] Qanti metri Lab of Chodan Foulad Khaiam Co. (2013) Iran, Mashhad. Khaiam st., 78.
[10] ASTM Standard E0008 (2009) Test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards Vol 03.01.
[11] ASTM Standard E0023 (2009) Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 03.01.
[12] ASTM Standard E 399 (2009) test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness KIc of metallic materials, Annual Book of ASTM Vol 03.01.
[13] Williams J, Fatemi A (2007) Fatigue performance of forged steel and ductile cast iron crankshafts, The University of Toledo, Prepared for the Forging Industry Educational Research Foundation (FIERF).
[14] 3DS Dassault Systemes, Copyright 2002-2012, version 611. http://simulia.custhelp.com.
[15] Nguyen O, Repetto EA, Oritz M, Radovitzky RA (2001) A cohesive model of fatigue crack growth. International Journal of Fracture 110: 351–369
[16] Weisbrod G, Rittel D (2000) A method for dynamic fracture toughness determination using short beams. International Journal of Fracture 104: 89–103.