Application and Comparison of Pressure and Velocity Correction Methods and Boundary Conditions in WCSPH Method for numerical modelling of 3D Inviscid Fluid Flow

Authors

1 Marine Department, Mechanics Faculty, Malek-Ashtar university of technology,Shahin-Shahr,Iran

2 Assis. Prof., Marine Eng. Depart., Faculty of Mechanics, Malek-Ashtar Univ. Tech., Shahin-Shahr, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

In this paper, Weakly Compressible Smoothed Hydrodynamic (WCSPH) method was used to numerically simulate the three dimensional dam-break with obstacle in front of the flow. Euler equations as governing equations of inviscid fluid flow were used. Large and unphysical oscillations in pressure and velocity field are one of the most important problems in this method. In present study using density filter and conservative Riemann solvers, these oscillations was controlled and results of these two methods were compared with experimental data. Furthermore due to common using of artificial viscosity in WCSPH method, the simulation was implemented using artificial viscosity in momentum equations without density filtering and compared with last two methods. This comparison showed that the conservative Riemann solvers could well control the oscillations in pressure and velocity field and gives correct pressure results in WCSPH method. Finally two boundary conditions called dynamic and Repulsive forces were investigated in this paper.

Keywords

References

[1] Chanson H (2006) Tsunami surges on dry coastal plains: application of dam break equations. Coast Eng J 48(4): 355-370.
[2] Deng X, Liu H, Lu S (2018) Analytical study of dam-break wave tip region. J Hydraul Eng 144(5): 04018015.
[3] P. Jančík and T. Hyhlík, “Pressure evaluation during dam break using weakly compressible SPH,” in Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2018, edited by P. Dančová and J. Novosád (Technická univerzita Liberec, Liberec, 2018), pp. 219–224
[4] Monaghan JJ (1994) Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys (110): 399-406.
[5] Crespo A, Gomez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple RA (2008) Modeling dam break behavior over a wet bed by a SPH technique. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 134(6): 313-320.
[6] Dalrymple RA, Rogers BD (2006) Numerical modeling of water waves with the SPH method. Coast Eng 2–3(53): 141-147.
[7] Rostami Varnousfaaderani M, Ketabdari MJ (2015) Numerical simulation of plunging wave breaker impact by a modified Turbulent WCSPH method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 37(2): 507-523.
[8] Gomez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple RA (2004) Using a three-dimensional smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for wave impact on a tall structure. J Waterw Port C-ASCE 130: 63-69.
[9] Monaghan JJ, Kos A (1999) Solitary waves on a cretan beach. J Waterw Port C-ASCE 3(125): 145-155.
[10] Colagrossi A, Landrini M (2003) Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys (191): 448-475.
[11] Monaghan JJ (1989) On the problem of penetration in particle methods. J Comput Phys (82): 1-15.
[12] Monaghan JJ (2005) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Rep Prog Phys (68): 1703-1759.
[13] Vila JP (1999) On particle weighted methods and Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics. Math Models Meth Appl Sci 9(2): 161-209.
[14] Rogers BD, Dalrymple RA, Stansby PK (2010) Simulation of caisson breakwater movement using 2-D SPH. J Hydraul Res 48: 135-141.
[15] Gómez-Gesteira M (2006) Spheric SPH benchmark test cases: Test 1 - Force exerted by a schematic 3D dam break on a square cylinder. [Online]. Available: http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uksph/TestCasesSPH_Test1.html.
[16] Lucy LB (1977) A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. The Astro J (84): 1013-1024.
[17] Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc (181): 375-389.
[18] Monaghan JJ, Lattanzio JC (1985) A refined method for astrophysical problems. Astron Astrophys (149): 135-143.
[19] Monaghan JJ (1992) Smoothed paticle hydrodynamics. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys (30): 543-574.
[20] Dalrymple RA, Knio O (2001) SPH modeling of water waves. ASCE.
[21] Rogers BD, Dalrymple RA (2008) SPH modeling of tsunami waves. in Advances in Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Advanced Numerical Models for tsunami waves and runup edition, vol. 10, World Scientific.
[22] Ramsden JD (1993) Tsunamis: Forces on a vertical wall caused by long waves, bores, and surges on a dry bed. PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
[23] Al-Faesly T, Palermo D, Nistor I, Cornett A (2012) Experimental modeling of extreme hydrodynamic forces on structural models. Int J Prot Struct 3(4): 477-505.
Journal of Solid and Fluid Mechanics
Volume 9, Issue 4
December 2019
Pages 227-236

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics