Thermodynamic and economic analyses of combined generation system based on hybrid prime mover of internal and external combustion engines with natural gas and biomass power sources

Authors

1 shahrood university of technology

2 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology

10.22044/jsfm.2024.13577.3790

Abstract

In this paper, a combined cooling, heating and power system based on hybrid drive of internal sand external combustion engines with biomass power source with a gasification reactor with air gasification agent and of the counter flow type is discussed and the synthesis gas obtained from this equipment is used in a gas-burning internal combustion engine. This proposed system has been compared with a similar cogeneration system with a natural gas power source, and energy and economic perspectives have been used for the system. The results show that the proposed system that uses synthesis gas as input fuel will have a significant advantage from energy and economic viewpoints compared to the case where natural gas is used as the main fuel, where the parameter related to the percentage reduction of primary energy consumption shows that if synthesis gas is used as a fuel in the drive of the internal combustion engine, compared to natural gas, it will save 40.55% in input energy consumption. The proposed system with synthetic gas fuel has a significant advantage from the economic point of view and the percentage of fuel consumption reduction, so that the results show a savings of 83.98% in fuel consumption costs. The results also show that the total price of electricity production in the proposed system with biomass and synthesis gas power source in different rotational speeds of the internal combustion engine will be lower and more economical compared to the cost of electricity production with natural gas fuel.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Kirubakaran, A., Jain, S. and Nema, R.K. (2009) A review on fuel cell technologies and power electronic interface. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13(9), pp.2430-2440.
  • Asgari, N., Saray, R.K. and Mirmasoumi, S.(2020) Energy and exergy analyses of a novel seasonal CCHP system driven by a gas turbine integrated with a biomass gasification unit and a LiBr-water absorption chiller. Energy Conversion and Management, 220, p.113096.
  • Balafkandeh, S., Zare, V. and Gholamian, E.(2019). Multi-objective optimization of a tri-generation system based on biomass gasification/digestion combined with S-CO2 cycle and absorption chiller. Energy Conversion and Management, 200, p.112057.
  • Fakhari, I., Behzadi, A., Gholamian, E., Ahmadi, P. and Arabkoohsar, A.(2021). Design and tri-objective optimization of a hybrid efficient energy system for tri-generation, based on PEM fuel cell and MED using syngas as a fuel. J. Cleaner Produc., 290, p.125205.
  • Akrami, E., Ameri, M. and Rocco, M.V.(2020). Integration of biomass-fueled power plant and MCFC-cryogenic CO2 separation unit for low-carbon power production: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic comparative analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 223, p.113304.
  • Zhang, J., Cui, P., Yang, S., Zhou, Y., Du, W., Wang, Y., Deng, C. and Wang, S.(2023). Thermodynamic analysis of SOFC–CCHP system based on municipal sludge plasma gasification with carbon capture. Applied Energy, 336, p.120822.
  • Xie, N., Xiao, Z., Du, W., Deng, C., Liu, Z. and Yang, S. (2023) Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell/absorption chiller CCHP system based on biomass gasification. Energy, 262, p.125595.
  • Wang, Y., Wehrle, L., Banerjee, A., Shi, Y. and Deutschmann, O.(2021) Analysis of a biogas-fed SOFC CHP system based on multi-scale hierarchical modeling. Renewable Energy, 163, pp.78-87.
  • Akrami, E., Ameri, M. and Rocco, M.V.(2021). Conceptual design, exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization for a novel integration of biomass-fueled power plant with MCFC-cryogenic CO2 separation unit for low-carbon power production. Energy, 227, p.120511.
  • Mehr, A.S., Lanzini, A., Santarelli, M. and Rosen, M.A.(2021). Polygeneration systems based on high temperature fuel cell (MCFC and SOFC) technology: System design, fuel types, modeling and analysis approaches. Energy, 228, p.120613.
  • برجی بداغی، مهدی، آتشکاری، کاظم، قربانی، صبا، و نریمان زاده، نادر. (1396). تحلیل ترمودینامیکی و بهینه سازی چندهدفی سیستم هیبرید متشکل از فرآیند گازی سازی زیست توده, پیل سوختی اکسید جامد و میکرو توربین گاز. مکانیک سازه ها و شاره ها، 7(1 )، 113-133. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/212702/fa
  • Rahimi M.J, Hamedi M.H, Amidpour M, Thermodynamic, Economic and Case Study of Synthesis Gas Using the Biomass Gasification Reactor in Distributed Generation Systems, Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2019;19(6):1417-1428
  • Shayan, E., Zare, V. and Mirzaee, I., 2019. On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization. Energy, 171, pp.1126-1138.
  • Rabea, K., Michailos, S., Hughes, K.J., Ingham, D. and Pourkashanian, M.(2023). Comprehensive process simulation of a biomass-based hydrogen production system through gasification within the BECCS concept in a commercial two-stage fixed bed gasifier. Energy Conversion and Management, 298, p.117812.
  • Khalilarya, S., Chitsaz, A. and Mojaver, P.(2021). Optimization of a combined heat and power system based gasification of municipal solid waste of Urmia University student dormitories via ANOVA and taguchi approaches. Int. J. Hydr. Energ., 46(2), pp.1815-1827.
  • Borooah, R., Antolini, D., Piazzi, S., Cordioli, E., Patuzzi, F. and Baratieri, M.(2023). Investigations into the performance and emissions of a small-scale CHP system using producer gas obtained from gasification of forest residues. J. Energ. Instit., 110, p.101354.
  • Fatiguso, M., Valenti, A.R. and Ravelli, S.(2023). Comparative energy performance analysis of micro gas turbine and internal combustion engine in a cogeneration plant based on biomass gasification. J. Cleaner Produc., p.139782.
  • Nadaleti, W.C. and Przybyla, G.(2020). NOx, CO and HC emissions and thermodynamic-energetic efficiency of an SI gas engine powered by gases simulated from biomass gasification under different H2 content. Int. J. Hydr. Energ., 45(41), pp.21920-21939.
  • Sanaye, S., Khakpaay, N. and Chitsaz, A.(2020) Thermo-economic and environmental multi-objective optimization of a novel arranged biomass-fueled gas engine and backpressure steam turbine combined system for pulp and paper mills. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 40, p.100778.
  • Yun, K.T., Cho, H., Luck, R. and Mago, P.J.(2013) Modeling of reciprocating internal combustion engines for power generation and heat recovery. Applied energy, 102, pp.327-335.
  • Li, X., Kan, X., Sun, X., Zhao, Y., Ge, T., Dai, Y. and Wang, C.H.(2019) Performance analysis of a biomass gasification-based CCHP system integrated with variable-effect LiBr-H2O absorption cooling and desiccant dehumidification. Energy, 176, pp.961-979.
  • Khanmohammadi, K. Atashkari, R. Kouhikamali, Performance assessment and multi-objective optimization of a trigeneration system with modified biomass gasification model, Modares Mechanical Engineering Vol.15, No. 9, pp. 209-222, 2015 (In Persian)
  • Sheykhi, M., Chahartaghi, M., Balakheli, M.M., Kharkeshi, B.A. and Miri, S.M.(2019) Energy, exergy, environmental, and economic modeling of combined cooling, heating and power system with Stirling engine and absorption chiller. Energy conversion and management, 180, pp.183-195.
  • Kongtragool, B. and Wongwises, S. (2005). Investigation on power output of the gamma-configuration low temperature differential Stirling engines. Renewable Energy, 30(3), pp.465-476.
  • Mehrpooya, M., Sayyad, S. and Zonouz, M.J. (2017). Energy, exergy and sensitivity analyses of a hybrid combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) plant with molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) and Stirling engine. J. cleaner produc., 148, pp.283-294.
  • Ehyaei, M.A., Ahmadi, A., Assad, M.E.H. and Rosen, M.A.(2020) Investigation of an integrated system combining an Organic Rankine Cycle and absorption chiller driven by geothermal energy: Energy, exergy, and economic analyses and optimization. J. Cleaner Produc., 258, p.120780.
  • Yao, E., Wang, H., Wang, L., Xi, G. and Maréchal, F (2017) Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power based compressed air energy storage system. Energy conversion and management, 138, pp.199-209.
  • Habibollahzade, A., Gholamian, E., Houshfar, E. and Behzadi, A. (2018) Multi-objective optimization of biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell integrated with Stirling engine and electrolyzer. Energy conversion and management, 171, pp.1116-1133.
  • Zhang, X., Liu, X., Sun, X., Jiang, C., Li, H., Song, Q., Zeng, J. and Zhang, G (2018) Thermodynamic and economic assessment of a novel CCHP integrated system taking biomass, natural gas and geothermal energy as co-feeds. Energy Conversion and Management, 172, pp.105-118.
  • Wang, S. and Fu, Z.(2019) Thermodynamic and economic analysis of solar assisted CCHP-ORC system with DME as fuel. Energy Conversion and Management, 186, pp.535-545.
  • Roy, D., Samanta, S. and Ghosh, S.(2020) Performance assessment of a biomass-fuelled distributed hybrid energy system integrating molten carbonate fuel cell, externally fired gas turbine and supercritical carbon dioxide cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 211, p.112740.
  • Arbabi, P., Abbassi, A., Mansoori, Z. and Seyfi, M.(2017) Joint numerical-technical analysis and economical evaluation of applying small internal combustion engines in combined heat and power (CHP). Applied Thermal Engineering, 113, pp.694-704.
  • Shayan, E., Zare, V. and Mirzaee, I.J.E.C.(2018) Hydrogen production from biomass gasification; a theoretical comparison of using different gasification agents. Energy Conversion and management, 159, pp.30-41.
  • Zainal Z.A., Ali R., Lean C.H., Seetharamu K.N (2001), Prediction of performance of a downdraft gasifier using equilibrium modeling for different biomass materials. Energy Conversion and management, 42, pp. 1499–515
Journal of Solid and Fluid Mechanics
Volume 13, Issue 6
January and February 2024
Pages 103-119

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics