Active Vibration control and reduction of shear force of 5MW wind turbine with the help of gyroscope actuator

Authors

1 - Master of Science Mechatronic Engineering, Mechanical Department, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak, Iran

2 Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Department, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak, Iran

3 PhD, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Department, Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat-Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

One of the main concerns in renewable energy technologies, such as wind turbines, is the economic cost and cost savings associated with its construction. Reducing the vibrations of a turbine structure can attenuate the fatigue damage caused by wind loads led to reduction in material consumption and cost. Besides, if the force and flexural moment at the base of the structure is reduced, a smaller foundation can be used to install the wind turbine. All of these factors have a positive impact on lowering the cost of a wind turbine. In this study, application of gyroscopic stabilization to decrease the wind-induced vibrations in 5 mega Watt wind turbine is studied. A valid FAST model is employed for this purpose. Moreover, two versions of the gyroscopic actuator including a passive stabilizer and an active gyroscopic actuator has been proposed. Furthermore, a PID controller has been designed to control the active system. The effect of gyroscope actuator on vibration, shear force and bending moment caused by wind loads is studied via extensive simulations. It was shown that the proposed system can reduce the decease the tip vibration, base shear and base moment by 32 percent in active mode and 14 percent in passive mode. As a result enclosing circle of foundation reduces 5 meter.

Keywords


[1] International Energy Agency (2019) Global energy and CO2  status report: 3-23, Available at: www.iea.org.
[2] Enviromental Protection Agency (2017) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse gas emissions and sinks report: 522-525, Available at: www.epa.gov.
[3] Energy Information Agency (2019) U.S. Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions report: 4-14, Available at: www.eia.gov.
[4] World Wide Energy Association (2021) Global wind installation in 2020 report:1-2, Available at: www.wwea.org.
[5] Stephy T, et al. (2020) 2018 Cost of wind    energy review. National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL).
[6] Fitzgerald B, et al. (2020) Vibration control of wind turbines: Recent advances and emerging trends Int J Sustain Struct Mater-Sys 4(2-4): 347-472.
[7] Sayigh A, Milborrow D (Eds.) (2019) The age of wind energy: Progress and future directions from a global perspective. Springer Nature, Switzerland. 313-314.
[8] Taylor M (2012) Renewable energy technologies: Cost analysis series, wind power. Renew Energ 1(5): 1-64.
[9] Bossanyi EA (2003) Individual blade pitch control for load reduction. Wind Energy 6(2): 119-128.
[10] Argyriadis K, Hille N. (2004). Determination of fatigue loading on a wind turbine with oil damping device. Proc 2004 EWEC: (1-6).
[11] Murtagh P, et al. (2008) Passive control of wind turbine vibrations including blade/tower interaction and rotationally sampled turbulence. Wind Energy 11(4): 305-317.
[12] Colwell S, Basu B (2009) Tuned liquid column dampers in offshore wind turbines for structural control. Adv Earthq Engn 31(2): 358-368.
[13] Karimi HR, Zapateiro M, Luo N (2010) Semiactive vibration control of offshore wind turbine towers with tuned liquid column dampers using H output feedback control. IEEE Intl Conf Contr 2245-2249.
[14] Lackner MA, Rotea MA (2011) Passive structural control of offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy 14(3): 373-388.
[15] Jie L, Zili Z, Jianbing C (2012) Experimental study on vibration control of offshore wind turbines using a ball vibration absorber. Energy Power Eng 4(3):153-157.
 
[16] Si Y, Karimi HR, Gao H (2014) Modelling and optimization of a passive structural control design for a spar-type floating wind turbine. Adv Earthq Engn 69: 168-182.
[17] Caterino N (2015) Semi-active control of a wind turbine via magnetorheological dampers. J Sound Vib 345: 1-17.
[18] Zuo H, Bi K, Hao H (2017) Using multiple tuned mass dampers to control offshore wind turbine vibrations under multiple hazards. Eng Struct 141: 303-315.
[19] Jahangiri V, Sun C (2019) Integrated bi-directional vibration control and energy harvesting of monopile offshore wind turbines. Ocean Eng 178: 260-269.
 [20] Guntur S, et al. (2017) A validation and code-to-code verification of FAST for a megawatt-scale wind turbine with aeroelastically tailored blades. Wind Energy Sci 2(2): 443-468.
[21] Guntur S, et al. (2016) Fast v8 verification and validation using experiments from aeroelastically tailored megawatt-scale wind turbine blades. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report: 7-17, Available at: www. nrel. gov/docs.
[22] Jonkman JM (2007) Dynamics modeling and loads analysis of an offshore floating wind turbine. National Renewable Energy Report: 51-71, Available at: www. nrel. gov/docs.
[23] Jonkman J, et al. (2009) Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. National Renewable Energy       Lab Report: 6-11, Available at: www.nrel. gov/docs.
[24] Svensson H (2010) Design of foundations for wind turbines. Eng Struct: 10-13, ISSN 0281-6679.
[25] Söndgen S, Predki W (2013) Power loss and axial load carrying capacity of radial cylindrical roller bearings. Power Transm Eng 42-47.
[26] Nelias D, et al. (1994) Power loss prediction in high-speed roller bearings. Tribology S 27: 465-478.
[27] American Roller Bearigs Company (2013) Heavy duty bearings catalog 201223. 1350 4th St Dr NW Hickory, NC 28601.
[28] Jonkman BJ, Buhl Jr ML (2006) TurbSim user's guide. National Renewable Energy Lab Report: 5-17. Available at: www.wind.nrel.gov/designcodes /preprocessors/turbsim.
[29] Ünker F, Çuvalcı O (2015) Seismic motion control of a column using a gyroscope. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195: 2316-2325.
[30] Ziegler JG, Nichols NB (1993) Optimum settings for automatic controllers. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Contr 115(2(B)): 220-222.
[31] IRENA (2020) Renewable Power generation costs in 2019 report: 25-30. Available at: www.irena.org/publications.